Liam Krall vs Cyrus Mahjoob Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Jul at 07:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Krall vs C. Mahjoob

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Krall 1 - 0 Mahjoob
They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Krall winning 2 and Cyrus Mahjoob winning 0. The last match between Liam Krall and Cyrus Mahjoob was at the M15 Rochester, 17-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Liam Krall getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krall | 1 |
| Mahjoob | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Rochester(07-17-25)
L. Krall vs C. Mahjoob H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.93% (39-32) | Career Total W/L | 62.50% (15-9) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Krall vs C. Mahjoob Match Preview:
- Mahjoob excels in recent second serve performance, securing 48.08% of points, whereas Krall is slightly behind at 43.64%.
- How crucial is second serve performance in predicting match outcomes? It is highly significant.
- Mahjoob falls short against Krall in returning opponents' second serves, with Krall capturing a stronger 51.36% compared to Mahjoob’s 45.1%.
- Regarding first serve returns, Mahjoob demonstrates superiority at 41.46%, substantially ahead of Krall’s 28.99%.
- Can break point resilience influence match predictions? Certainly, as Mahjoob saves 68.42% of breakpoints versus Krall's 47.62%.
- Analyzing career surface preferences shows that Mahjoob thrives on clay with a 67% win rate, while Krall is optimal on hard courts, achieving 63%.
- Both players have similar overall match win percentages in lower-tier tournaments, with Krall slightly edging out Mahjoob in match experience.
- Mahjoob has faced tougher opponents over the past year, encountering players with an average rank of 71.63, compared to Krall's 157.75.
- Is deciding set performance a key factor? Indeed, as Mahjoob maintains a flawless record in deciding sets within the last 12 months, unlike Krall who has a lower success rate.
- Evaluating breakpoint conversion rates reveals that Krall holds a slight edge with a 30.69% success rate compared to Mahjoob’s 26.32%.
Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the players' recent performances and strengths, Mahjoob shows prowess in saving breakpoints and has a formidable record in deciding sets, providing a mental advantage in crucial moments.
Krall, however, demonstrates a solid ability to return opponents' second serves and displays slightly better conversion rates when breaking serve. These factors could weigh heavily in prolonged rallies or tight situations.
Considering Mahjoob has faced more challenging opponents recently, this experience might offer a competitive edge, yet Krall's consistency cannot be underestimated.
In conclusion, while both players have distinct advantages, Mahjoob's resilience under pressure and superior opponent track record suggest she is the likely winner in the upcoming match.
Liam Krall vs Cyrus Mahjoob Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Krall vs C. Mahjoob H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:31:54 | Average Match Time | 1:31:54 |
| 59% (34/58) | 1st Serve % | 64% (32/50) |
| 76% (26/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (18/32) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (25/50) | Return Points Win % | 34% (20/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Krall Recent Matches Played
C. Mahjoob Recent Matches Played

L. Krall vs C. Mahjoob Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.93% (39/32) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.50% (15/9) |
| 55.28% (89/72) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.26% (32/22) |
| 53.71% (810/698) | Games Win/Loss | 53.88% (278/238) |
| 60.78% (31/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (8/4) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 105 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 138 | Total Double Faults | 29 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 218.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 104.79 |
| 56% (1189/2111) | 1st Serve % | 67% (455/676) |
| 66% (780/1189) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (273/455) |
| 47% (434/922) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (105/221) |
| 43% (99/230) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (29/60) |
| 42% (874/2064) | Return Points Win % | 41% (265/651) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.52% (39/30) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (15/9) |
| 55% (39/71) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 50% (7/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 42% (8/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 84% (44/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (13/11) |
| 16% (44/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (13/2) |
| 7% (27/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 36% (11/4) |